Re: pgsql is 75 times faster with my new index scan - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From devik@cdi.cz
Subject Re: pgsql is 75 times faster with my new index scan
Date
Msg-id 39D3330A.6B7A8954@cdi.cz
Whole thread Raw
In response to RE: pgsql is 75 times faster with my new index scan  ("Mikheev, Vadim" <vmikheev@SECTORBASE.COM>)
List pgsql-hackers
> > question is whether we need it for hash indices. it is definitely
> > good for btree as they support range retrieval. hash ind. doesn't
> > it so I wouldn't implement it for them.
> 
> We need in fast heap tuple --> index tuple lookup for overwriting
> storage manager anyway...
oh .. there will be such one ?




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Reimplementing permission checks for rules
Next
From: devik@cdi.cz
Date:
Subject: Re: pgsql is 75 times faster with my new index scan