RE: WTF is going on with PG_VERSION? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Robert D. Nelson
Subject RE: WTF is going on with PG_VERSION?
Date
Msg-id 39C62C77@rba6.rbapro.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to WTF is going on with PG_VERSION?  ("Alexey V. Borzov" <borz_off@rdw.ru>)
Responses RE: WTF is going on with PG_VERSION?  (The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>)
List pgsql-general
>I'm wondering if you could be running out of kernel filetable slots,
>so that the open of PG_VERSION is failing with ENFILE.  (This would be

An interesting slashdot thread (that's saying alot, since I despise the
place ;) yesterday mentioned putting cached stuff in RAM drives. Would that
alleviate the problem, if one could load just the PG_VERSION's in there, or
would it still need to allocate it when it was trying to read it? Don't
think it's a real solution, merely curious :)


Rob Nelson
rdnelson@co.centre.pa.us


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "Tomas B. Winkler"
Date:
Subject: Re: postgres-user <-> unix user
Next
From: "Robert D. Nelson"
Date:
Subject: RE: Cant create new users or databases