Re: LIKE is still short some MULTIBYTE code - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Joseph Shraibman
Subject Re: LIKE is still short some MULTIBYTE code
Date
Msg-id 39C285FE.46CA773F@selectacast.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to LIKE is still short some MULTIBYTE code  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hasn't the [HACKERS] / [GENERAL] crossover thing been resolved yet?  I'm
not subscribed to hackers.

Tom Lane wrote:
> 
> I finished revising the LIKE operators back into an index-optimizable
> form.  But I notice there is some non-multibyte-aware code that needs
> to be fixed, specifically the pattern analysis routines in
> src/backend/utils/adt/selfuncs.c:
>         like_fixed_prefix
>         regex_fixed_prefix
>         like_selectivity
>         regex_selectivity_sub
>         regex_selectivity
> I don't have time to work on this now, but perhaps someone else would
> like to fix these...
> 
>                         regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: LIKE is still short some MULTIBYTE code
Next
From: Jan Wieck
Date:
Subject: Re: Winner Notification - Linux Magazine Editor's Choice Awards (fwd))