> 18 марта 2020 г., в 00:37, Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> написал(а):
>
> On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 10:20 PM Andrey M. Borodin <x4mmm@yandex-team.ru> wrote:
>> It seems to me that it's exactly the same check that I was trying to verify in amcheck patch [0].
>> But there it was verified inside amcheck, but here it is verified by index scan.
>
> Maybe we can accept your patch after fixing this bug. My objection to
> the patch was that it couples locks in a way that's not compatible
> with btree_xlog_unlink_page(). But the problem now seems to have been
> btree_xlog_unlink_page() itself. It's possible that there are problems
> elsewhere, but my recollection is that btree_xlog_unlink_page() was
> the problem.
The problem was that btree_xlog_split() and btree_xlog_unlink_page() do not couple locks during fixing left links.
Probably, patch in this thread should fix this in btree_xlog_split() too?
Best regards, Andrey Borodin.
