Re: Great Bridge benchmark results for Postgres, 4 others - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Ned Lilly
Subject Re: Great Bridge benchmark results for Postgres, 4 others
Date
Msg-id 39996E05.C0739844@greatbridge.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to RE: Great Bridge benchmark results for Postgres, 4 others  ("Dan Browning" <danb@cyclonecomputers.com>)
Responses Re: Great Bridge benchmark results for Postgres, 4 others  ("Ross J. Reedstrom" <reedstrm@rice.edu>)
List pgsql-general
Oh, Dan, I'm not that clever... ;-)

But I *can* tell you that the market leading proprietary RDBMS products we
tested were not IBM, Informix, or Sybase.

Regards,
Ned


Dan Browning wrote:

> > Can you tell us what version of the (ahem) unnamed
> > proprietary products
> > you used? :-). For example if you used version 8i of an unnamed
> > proprietry product, that might be informative :-).
>
> Oh, but even if you can't tell us what version was used, I'm sure you could
> tell us that story about the monster you saw last week.  But which monster
> was it?  Was it the monster that ATE EYEs?  And I remember you once said
> there was a second monster, could you describe it as well?


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Ned Lilly
Date:
Subject: Re: Great Bridge benchmark results for Postgres, 4 others
Next
From: Ned Lilly
Date:
Subject: Re: Great Bridge benchmark results for Postgres, 4 others