Re: Great Bridge benchmark results for Postgres, 4 others - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Ross J. Reedstrom
Subject Re: Great Bridge benchmark results for Postgres, 4 others
Date
Msg-id 20000815114551.B24051@rice.edu
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Great Bridge benchmark results for Postgres, 4 others  (Ned Lilly <ned@greatbridge.com>)
List pgsql-general
On Tue, Aug 15, 2000 at 12:21:25PM -0400, Ned Lilly wrote:
> Oh, Dan, I'm not that clever... ;-)
>
> But I *can* tell you that the market leading proprietary RDBMS products we
> tested were not IBM, Informix, or Sybase.
>

And in reply to the MySQL version comment/question, Ned said:
 "We only used the released versions of each database."

I took that to mean they used the latest released version of each
database.  One thing I couldn't deduce: which operating system where the
commercial RDBMs run on top of? NT for one of them, for sure, but the
other can probably run on either of the quoted OSs. If it was run on NT,
we might be seeing the linux vs. NT effect.

Ross
--
Ross J. Reedstrom, Ph.D., <reedstrm@rice.edu>
NSBRI Research Scientist/Programmer
Computer and Information Technology Institute
Rice University, 6100 S. Main St.,  Houston, TX 77005

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Ned Lilly
Date:
Subject: Re: Great Bridge benchmark results for Postgres, 4 others
Next
From: "Steve Wolfe"
Date:
Subject: Tuning PostgreSQL to use more RAM...