Re: pg_dump versus ancient server versions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: pg_dump versus ancient server versions
Date
Msg-id 3996712.1635176331@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_dump versus ancient server versions  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> On 10/25/21 10:23, Tom Lane wrote:
>> (Hmmm ... but disk space could
>> become a problem, particularly on older machines with not so much
>> disk.  Do we really need to maintain a separate checkout for each
>> branch?  It seems like a fresh checkout from the repo would be
>> little more expensive than the current copy-a-checkout process.)

> If you set it up with these settings then the disk space used is minimal:
>      git_use_workdirs => 1,
>      rm_worktrees => 1,

Maybe we should make those the defaults?  AFAICS the current
default setup uses circa 200MB per back branch, even between runs.
I'm not sure what that is buying us.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Mikhail
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Make ENOSPC not fatal in semaphore creation
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: when the startup process doesn't (logging startup delays)