On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 2:11 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Richard Broersma <richard.broersma@gmail.com> writes:
>> Can anyone one explain why a "WITH RECURSIVE" query has the same
>> results regardless whether UNION or UNION ALL is specified?
>
> Well, if the rows are all different anyway, UNION isn't going to
> eliminate any ...
Actually I'm still confused. I must me missing something. When I
manually following the directions of:
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.4/interactive/queries-with.html
I get the following when I try:
WITH RECURSIVE t(n) AS ( VALUES (1) UNION ALL SELECT n+1 FROM t WHERE n < 100
)
SELECT sum(n) FROM t;
(1) --initial non-recursive working table
(1) UA (2) = (1,2) --new(1) working table
(1,2) UA (2,3) = (1,2,2,3) --new(2) working table
(1,2,2,3) UA (2,3,3,4) = (1,2,2,2,3,3,3,4) --new(3) working table
--
Regards,
Richard Broersma Jr.
Visit the Los Angeles PostgreSQL Users Group (LAPUG)
http://pugs.postgresql.org/lapug
