Re: Ah, yet another cause for not binding the right port.... - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Martijn van Oosterhout
Subject Re: Ah, yet another cause for not binding the right port....
Date
Msg-id 39424ADD.1B95C4E3@cupid.suninternet.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Cannot INDEX an Access97 ODBC  (<lampe@durawebs.com>)
List pgsql-general
Steve Wolfe wrote:
>    When postgres binds to any port, it likes to write a file in /tmp, along
> the lines of ".s.PGSQL.5432".  If /tmp is not writeable by the postgres

Just in case you missed it, that file in /tmp is not a real file, but
a "socket" (Unix domain).

> process, it will not be able to bind to any port.  However, it doesn't give
> you an intelligent error message like "Can't create file", it simply says
> that it can't bind the port, and of course, asks if another postgres
> process is already running.

If the node is there, it can't "bind" to the "port". Ofcourse, you
just delete it to mix it :)
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@cupid.suninternet.com>
http://cupid.suninternet.com/~kleptog/

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: lampe@durawebs.com
Date:
Subject: RE: FIXED: Cannot INDEX an Access97 ODBC export?
Next
From: lampe@durawebs.com
Date:
Subject: libpgtcl.so? Called by pgaccess.