This was supposed to be fixed already, but I guess this is just more
code that didn't get into the cvs when it should have.
Stephen Crawley wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to port a large JDBC application to Postgres 7.0 from MySQL,
> and I've run into what I believe is a bug in the JDBC driver.
>
> When my application executes a "DELETE" statement, the ResultSet entry
> always says that 1 row has been deleted. Even when nothing has been
> deleted. I did a bit of investigation, and I think I've found where the
> problem is. In the class postgresql.Connection, the method
>
> public java.sql.ResultSet ExecSQL(String sql) throws SQLException
>
> contains the following code:
>
> ...
>
> int update_count = 1;
>
> ...
>
> case 'C': // Command Status
> recv_status = pg_stream.ReceiveString(8192);
>
> // Now handle the update count correctly.
> if(recv_status.startsWith("INSERT") || recv_status.startsWith("UPDATE")) {
> try {
> update_count =
> Integer.parseInt(recv_status.substring(1+recv_status.lastIndexOf('
> ')));
> } catch(NumberFormatException nfe) {
> throw new PSQLException("postgresql.con.fathom",recv_status);
> }
> }
>
> ...
>
> It looks like the code picks out the update count when the query was
> described (by the backend) as an INSERT or UPDATE. But it does not
> do this for a DELETE.
>
> I looked at the source of the backend (src/backend/tcop/dest.c, etc) and
> it does seem to return an update count for the CMD_DELETE command. If
> I've got this right, adding
>
> ... || recv_status.startsWith("DELETE") ...
>
> to the if statement should fix the problem.
>
> -- Steve
>
>
