Tom Lane wrote:
> (It might've been done the way it was done because there didn't use to
> be support for tables > 2gig, but in the current system I see no reason
> to be afraid of having one big table for LOs instead of many not-so-big
> ones.)
I am curious, how does PostgreSQL support tables larger than 2Gig, given
the file per table architecture?
--Barry
