Re: Since '2001-09-09 01:46:40'::timestamp microseconds are lost when extracting epoch - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: Since '2001-09-09 01:46:40'::timestamp microseconds are lost when extracting epoch
Date
Msg-id 38fc499a-ae52-efb6-aad6-82f812d6782d@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Since '2001-09-09 01:46:40'::timestamp microseconds are lost when extracting epoch  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Since '2001-09-09 01:46:40'::timestamp microseconds are lost when extracting epoch  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2020-09-09 15:38, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> and a few
>>> more calls of int8_numeric that could be converted.  I think the
>>> attached updated version is committable, and I'd recommend going
>>> ahead with that regardless of the rest of this.  I hadn't realized
>>> how many random calls of int8_numeric and int4_numeric we'd grown,
>>> but there are a lot, so this is nice cleanup.
> 
>> Yes, please go ahead with it.
> 
> It's your patch, I figured you'd want to commit it.

ok done

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Inconsistent Japanese name order in v13 contributors list
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: SIGQUIT handling, redux