Re: Since '2001-09-09 01:46:40'::timestamp microseconds are lost when extracting epoch - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Since '2001-09-09 01:46:40'::timestamp microseconds are lost when extracting epoch
Date
Msg-id 1893468.1599658711@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Since '2001-09-09 01:46:40'::timestamp microseconds are lost when extracting epoch  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: Since '2001-09-09 01:46:40'::timestamp microseconds are lost when extracting epoch  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> On 2020-09-07 01:46, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I reviewed the 0002 patch, finding one bug (in int8_sum)

> Ouch, no test coverage.  Should we perhaps remove this function, since 
> it's obsolete and unused?

I don't feel a need to.

>> and a few
>> more calls of int8_numeric that could be converted.  I think the
>> attached updated version is committable, and I'd recommend going
>> ahead with that regardless of the rest of this.  I hadn't realized
>> how many random calls of int8_numeric and int4_numeric we'd grown,
>> but there are a lot, so this is nice cleanup.

> Yes, please go ahead with it.

It's your patch, I figured you'd want to commit it.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Etsuro Fujita
Date:
Subject: Minor cleanup of partbounds.c
Next
From: Julien Rouhaud
Date:
Subject: Re: Online checksums verification in the backend