Re: Inconsistent Japanese name order in v13 contributors list - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Inconsistent Japanese name order in v13 contributors list
Date
Msg-id 67322.1599676961@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Inconsistent Japanese name order in v13 contributors list  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> On 2020-Sep-09, Fujii Masao wrote:
>> Using given-name-first order is our consensus?

> That's indeed our historical practice.  See previous thread where we've
> discussed this at length,
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/20150613231826.GY133018%40postgresql.org#88d245a5cdd2b32e1e3e80fc07eab6f2

> The Economist piece Peter G cited is also relevant.

Right.  I think the decree the Economist cites might be sufficient
reason to reopen the discussion, though I surely don't want it to
turn into another long thread.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: WIP: BRIN multi-range indexes
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Since '2001-09-09 01:46:40'::timestamp microseconds are lost when extracting epoch