Re: libpq++ memory problems - Mailing list pgsql-interfaces

From Tim Brookes
Subject Re: libpq++ memory problems
Date
Msg-id 38FF2126.9525DB82@mcmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to libpq++ memory problems  (Tim Brookes <tim.brookes@mcmail.com>)
List pgsql-interfaces
Tom

I did not use configure - I downloaded a set of RPMs for 6.5.3
I then just changed the program not to require PgEnv and then compiled,linked with
the libpq++ library.

Maybe I should download the sources and compile on my system, but I dont see how
that will change what I see as momory not being released in the PgDatabase
destructor.

Rgds
Tim

Tom Lane wrote:

> Tim Brookes <tim.brookes@mcmail.com> writes:
> > So I have downloaded and set up version 6.5.3 on a test system.  I then
> > altered the code on the example so that it no longer uses the PgEnv class.
> > I set my environment variable and ran the program now as below.  I still get
> > a huge memory leak.
>
> > Can I ask you what version you are using?
>
> Current CVS sources --- ie, 7.0RC1 plus or minus a little bit.  But as
> far as I can tell from the CVS logs, not much has been done to libpq++
> since 6.5; there's certainly nothing in the logs about fixing memory
> leaks.  So I'd have expected 6.5 to behave the same.  Interesting.
>
> > callproc(){
> >    PgDatabase* loStatsdb;
>
> >    loStatsdb = new PgDatabase("");
> >    delete loStatsdb;
> > };
>
> > main(){
> >     while(1){
> >         callproc();
> >     };
> > };
>
> AFAIR, my test program looked just like that except it specified a
> database name --- new PgDatabase("dbname=regression") or some such.
>
> I wonder if it could be platform- or configuration-specific.  What
> options did you give to configure?
>
>                         regards, tom lane



pgsql-interfaces by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: libpq++ memory problems
Next
From: Lamar Owen
Date:
Subject: Re: libpq++ memory problems