Re: Book and TEMP vs. TEMPORARY - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas Lockhart
Subject Re: Book and TEMP vs. TEMPORARY
Date
Msg-id 38ECBF33.8E12BF00@alumni.caltech.edu
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Book and TEMP vs. TEMPORARY  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Book and TEMP vs. TEMPORARY
List pgsql-hackers
> > TEMPORARY is SQL92 standard, TEMP is not.  Nuff said...
> OK, but TEMPORARY doesn't work on 6.5.*, right?

Sure it does (at least as far as I can tell. The test/locale stuff has
screwed up CVS update, so I have to do a clean checkout of at least
that directory to get my tree back in shape :(

And, to beat a dead horse, I'm *still* not sure why we are carrying
along the "TEMP" variant, losing the use of that name for other
things.
                    - Thomas

-- 
Thomas Lockhart                lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu
South Pasadena, California


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Temporary indexes
Next
From: Karel Zak
Date:
Subject: RE: pg_dumplo, thanks :) (fwd)