Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: [PATCH] Tracking statements entry timestamp in pg_stat_statements - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrei Zubkov
Subject Re: [PATCH] Tracking statements entry timestamp in pg_stat_statements
Date
Msg-id 3899058c1f739d8720b20ea34711e5a80e799d85.camel@moonset.ru
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCH] Tracking statements entry timestamp in pg_stat_statements  ("Gregory Stark (as CFM)" <stark.cfm@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [PATCH] Tracking statements entry timestamp in pg_stat_statements  (Andrei Zubkov <zubkov@moonset.ru>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
Hi Gregory,

> patching file contrib/pg_stat_statements/sql/oldextversions.sql
> can't find file to patch at input line 1833
> 
> 
> and
> 
> > --- a/contrib/pg_stat_statements/sql/pg_stat_statements.sql
> > +++ b/contrib/pg_stat_statements/sql/pg_stat_statements.sql
> --------------------------
> No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
> 
Thank you for your attention.

Yes, it is due to parallel work on "Normalization of utility queries in
pg_stat_statements" patch
(https://postgr.es/m/Y/7Y9U/y/keAW3qH@paquier.xyz)

It seems I've found something strange in new test files - I've
mentioned this in a thread of a patch. Once there will be any solution
I'll do a rebase again as soon as possible.

-- 
Andrei Zubkov
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Gregory Stark (as CFM)"
Date:
Subject: Re: Add a hook to allow modification of the ldapbindpasswd
Next
From: Melanie Plageman
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_stat_bgwriter.buffers_backend is pretty meaningless (and more?)