Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander@timescale.com> writes:
>> True, but from the perspective of the affected code, the question is
>> basically "did you call expression_planner() yet". So I like this
>> naming for that connection, whereas something based on "transformation"
>> doesn't really connect to anything in existing function names.
> Fair enough.
Pushed like that, then. Thanks for reviewing!
regards, tom lane
