Re: Boolean output format - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Boolean output format
Date
Msg-id 3872.1033833584@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Boolean output format  (Garo Hussenjian <garo@xapnet.com>)
Responses Re: Boolean output format  (Garo Hussenjian <garo@xapnet.com>)
List pgsql-general
Garo Hussenjian <garo@xapnet.com> writes:
> Were there any backward compatibility issues for SET DATESTYLE? What were
> the repercussions for the adapters?

Can't say.  It's been there for longer than I've been around this
project; and AFAIR no new values of DATESTYLE have been added in a long
time either.  You might try asking Tom Lockhart.

> Regarding the existing adapters - I very much agree with what you're saying,
> but such a feature would not necessarily break any existing adapters. The
> default format would remain unchanged

... not if someone decides to set BOOLEANSTYLE at the postgresql.conf
level, or in the per-user or per-database options that are available in
7.3.  Realistically, general-purpose client-side code is going to need
to work with any style that the backend might emit.

You might compare the discussions that have gone on in the past month or
so, since I (overhastily) added some backend support for an auto-commit
off mode.  I knew very well that the client libraries were mostly not
prepared to work with that, but I figured we could update them over
time.  Judging from the volume of complaints, that was a bad decision.
So I'm applying that experience to this issue with booleans ...

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Martin Weinberg
Date:
Subject: Re: multi-column btree index for real values
Next
From: Masaru Sugawara
Date:
Subject: Re: Dynamic limit for the number of records?