Re: Segfault logical replication PG 10.4 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: Segfault logical replication PG 10.4
Date
Msg-id 385363b3-205d-f167-5d26-9d260d34585c@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Segfault logical replication PG 10.4  (Mai Peng <maily.peng@webedia-group.com>)
Responses Re: Segfault logical replication PG 10.4  (Mai Peng <maily.peng@webedia-group.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 12.07.18 00:56, Mai Peng wrote:
> We discovered our pg_wal partition was full few days after setting our
> first logical publication on a PG 10.4 instance.
> Then, we can not synchronise our slave to the master, it triggers a
> segfault on the slave. We had to drop manually the subscription on slave
> and the slot on master.
> Then, we wanted to find the cause of this bug, stop connection between
> master and slave , after 30 minutes, the slave had a segfault and could
> not synchronise.
> Why does the slave can not synchronise without a complete creation
> subscription after dropping the slot?

Can you get a backtrace from the core dump produced by the segfault?

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: CVE-2017-7484-induced bugs, or, btree cmp functions are notleakproof?
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: missing toast table for pg_policy