Re: Why not install pgstattuple by default? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Why not install pgstattuple by default?
Date
Msg-id 3818.1304972490@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Why not install pgstattuple by default?  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes:
> Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of lun may 09 14:31:33 -0400 2011:
>> I'm happy enough with that set of guidelines: namely, that we'd use
>> src/extension only for things that don't require additional
>> dependencies, and not for things that build standalone executables.
>> If we're going to move things around, I think we should take the
>> trouble to categorize them along the way, and your idea of inserting
>> one more subdirectory under src/extension for grouping seems fine to
>> me.

> For executables we already have src/bin.  Do we really need a separate
> place for, say, pg_standby or pg_upgrade?

Putting them in there implies we think they are of core-code quality.
I'm definitely *not* ready to grant that status to pg_upgrade, for
instance.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Inconsistent treatment of serials in pg_dump
Next
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: Inconsistent treatment of serials in pg_dump