Re: Why not install pgstattuple by default? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: Why not install pgstattuple by default?
Date
Msg-id 1304969330-sup-1882@alvh.no-ip.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Why not install pgstattuple by default?  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Why not install pgstattuple by default?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Re: Why not install pgstattuple by default?  (Greg Smith <greg@2ndQuadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of lun may 09 14:31:33 -0400 2011:

> I'm happy enough with that set of guidelines: namely, that we'd use
> src/extension only for things that don't require additional
> dependencies, and not for things that build standalone executables.
> If we're going to move things around, I think we should take the
> trouble to categorize them along the way, and your idea of inserting
> one more subdirectory under src/extension for grouping seems fine to
> me.

For executables we already have src/bin.  Do we really need a separate
place for, say, pg_standby or pg_upgrade?

-- 
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Merlin Moncure
Date:
Subject: hint bit cache v5
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Collation mega-cleanups