On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 8:45 AM, Dickson dos Santos Guedes
<guediz@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 7:43 PM, Brendan Jurd <direvus@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I was going to try this patch out, but it would not apply. Seems that
> > where the patch should have &, it has & instead. Has this somehow
> > been HTML entity-ified?
>
> You are right, I don't now why this occurs. I'm sending it now
> gziped, You may test it again.
>
Hi Dickson,
I actually already corrected the '&'s manually and tested your
patch like that. It's nice -- I think this is a very worthwhile
addition to \dt+
I note that your last email only went to -hackers; you might want to
send the updated version of your patch to -patches as well.
Cheers,
BJ
