Re: Invalid to_date patterns (was: [PATCHES] [GENERAL] ISO week dates) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Brendan Jurd
Subject Re: Invalid to_date patterns (was: [PATCHES] [GENERAL] ISO week dates)
Date
Msg-id 37ed240d0707171700m7c0d2905y6e69e17dd3de7960@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Invalid to_date patterns (was: [PATCHES] [GENERAL] ISO week dates)  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Invalid to_date patterns (was: [PATCHES] [GENERAL] ISO week dates)  ("Brendan Jurd" <direvus@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 7/18/07, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> This is all good but I think that self-inconsistent format strings are
> not really the main source of to_date problems.  Most of the complaints
> I've seen arise from to_date plowing ahead to deliver a ridiculous
> answer when the input data string doesn't match the format.  I'd like to
> see the code try a little harder to validate the input data.
>

Agreed, but so far it doesn't look like there's much overlap between
the parsing and validating code and the stuff I'm playing with.

I'll keep an eye out for any opportunities to improve on this, but it
might end up being a separate TODO.


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Restartable signals 'n all that
Next
From: Gregory Stark
Date:
Subject: Re: SetBufferCommitInfoNeedsSave and race conditions