Re: [INTERFACES] problems with large-objects - Mailing list pgsql-interfaces

From Thomas Lockhart
Subject Re: [INTERFACES] problems with large-objects
Date
Msg-id 37F61F8E.FEF2A538@alumni.caltech.edu
Whole thread Raw
In response to problems with large-objects  (Wolfgang Hottgenroth <wn@kja-essen.de>)
List pgsql-interfaces
> did anyone of you ever saw some strange problems with large objects and
> the postgresql 6.51?

I don't work with Large Objects, but I am pretty sure that the
behavior was changed/fixed for v6.5 to *require* all large object
manipulation to happen within a transaction. This was always a
requirement, but Postgres did not enforce it and had some potentially
bad behavior lurking as a result.
                  - Thomas

-- 
Thomas Lockhart                lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu
South Pasadena, California


pgsql-interfaces by date:

Previous
From: Wolfgang Hottgenroth
Date:
Subject: problems with large-objects
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Perl5 selftest failure (was Re: Questions about vacuum analyze)