Re: [HACKERS] All things equal, we are still alot slower then MySQL? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas Lockhart
Subject Re: [HACKERS] All things equal, we are still alot slower then MySQL?
Date
Msg-id 37E4FC3E.29CA62E8@alumni.caltech.edu
Whole thread Raw
In response to All things equal, we are still alot slower then MySQL?  (The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] All things equal, we are still alot slower then MySQL?  (The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>)
Re: [HACKERS] All things equal, we are still alot slower then MySQL?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
> Using the exact same data, and the exact same queries (dbi is cool):
> MySQL: 0.498u 0.150s 0:02.50 25.6%     10+1652k 0+0io 0pf+0w
> PgSQL: 0.494u 0.061s 0:19.78 2.7%      10+1532k 0+0io 0pf+0w
> >From the 'time' numbers, MySQL is running ~17sec faster, but uses up 23%
> more CPU to do this...so where is our slowdown?

I don't remember if you gave details on the sizes of tables, but in
any case I'm going to guess that you are spending almost all of your
time in the optimizer. Try manipulating the parameters to force the
genetic optimizer and see if it helps. Lots of quals but only two
tables gives you a non-optimal case for the default exhaustive
optimizer.
                   - Thomas

-- 
Thomas Lockhart                lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu
South Pasadena, California


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Brett W. McCoy"
Date:
Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] PERL
Next
From: Thomas Lockhart
Date:
Subject: INSERT/DEFAULT VALUES broken?