Re: [HACKERS] Can ICU be used for a database's default sort order? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrey Borodin
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Can ICU be used for a database's default sort order?
Date
Msg-id 37A534BE-CBF7-467C-B096-0AAD25091A9F@yandex-team.ru
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Can ICU be used for a database's default sort order?  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Can ICU be used for a database's default sort order?
Re: [HACKERS] Can ICU be used for a database's default sort order?
List pgsql-hackers
Hi!

> 2 февр. 2018 г., в 21:14, Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> написал(а):
>
> On Fri, Feb 2, 2018 at 4:22 AM, Andrey Borodin <x4mmm@yandex-team.ru> wrote:
>> I can try to do this before next CF. But ISTM that EDB and Postgres Pro already have various flavours of similar
feature.Maybe they are planning to publish that? 
>
> I would definitely review that patch.

I've contacted Postgres Professional. Marina Polyakova had kindly provided their patch.
The patch allows to use libc locale with ICU collation as default for cluster or database.

It seems that this patch brings important long-awaited feature and deserves to be included in last v11 commitfest.
Peter, everyone, do you agree with this? Or should we better adapt this work through v12 cycle?

I'm planning to provide review asap and do necessary changes if required (this was discussed with Marina and Postgres
Professional).

Best regards, Andrey Borodin.

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: CALL stmt, ERROR: unrecognized node type: 113 bug
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Why does load_external_function() return PGFunction?