Re: BUG #16964: Quadratic performance degradation of INSERT and ADD CONSTRAINT for intarray/GIST EXCLUDE CONSTRAINT - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: BUG #16964: Quadratic performance degradation of INSERT and ADD CONSTRAINT for intarray/GIST EXCLUDE CONSTRAINT
Date
Msg-id 3794038.1618507064@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to BUG #16964: Quadratic performance degradation of INSERT and ADD CONSTRAINT for intarray/GIST EXCLUDE CONSTRAINT  (PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org>)
Responses Re: BUG #16964: Quadratic performance degradation of INSERT and ADD CONSTRAINT for intarray/GIST EXCLUDE CONSTRAINT
List pgsql-bugs
PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org> writes:
> I found that combination of EXCLUDE CONSTRAINT with intarray GIST have
> quadratic degradation with relation size.

Hm, I couldn't reproduce any such problem using this data set:

regression=# create table test (team_id int, user_ids int[]);
CREATE TABLE
regression=# insert into test select i, array[i*2,i*2+1] from generate_series(1,4096) i;
INSERT 0 4096
regression=# create extension btree_gist ;
CREATE EXTENSION
regression=# create extension intarray ;
CREATE EXTENSION
Time: 19.077 ms
regression=# ALTER TABLE test
ADD CONSTRAINT unique_user_parties_on_team
      EXCLUDE USING gist (
        team_id WITH =,
        user_ids WITH &&
      );
ALTER TABLE
Time: 459.005 ms
regression=# insert into test  values (10, array[1,2]);
INSERT 0 1
Time: 1.086 ms

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: PG Bug reporting form
Date:
Subject: BUG #16965: Select query fails with ERROR: XX000: could not find pathkey item to sort
Next
From: Maxim Boguk
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #16964: Quadratic performance degradation of INSERT and ADD CONSTRAINT for intarray/GIST EXCLUDE CONSTRAINT