Re: [INTERFACES] esql\c documentation - Mailing list pgsql-interfaces

From Thomas Lockhart
Subject Re: [INTERFACES] esql\c documentation
Date
Msg-id 376F2EFA.6AECCBE@alumni.caltech.edu
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [INTERFACES] esql\c documentation  (selkovjr@mcs.anl.gov)
List pgsql-interfaces
> Excuse me -- what's wrong with shift/reduce conflicts? I have over a
> hundred of those in one of my applications.

If it is the kind of shift/reduce conflict reported by yacc/bison
(rather than a less severe clarification printed in the bison "-v" log
file) then it means that there is a significant part of your grammar
which can *never* be reached! The parser will always choose one of the
two possible paths in the conflict, and will never choose the other.
Not good if you actually wanted to use the full language.
                   - Thomas

-- 
Thomas Lockhart                lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu
South Pasadena, California


pgsql-interfaces by date:

Previous
From: 오재훈
Date:
Subject: [Q] JDBC + Servlet ?
Next
From: Michael Meskes
Date:
Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] esql\c documentation