Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com> writes:
> On 2/17/24 20:20, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I don't have an immediate proposal for exactly what to call such a
>> function, but naming it by analogy to pg_typeof would be questionable.
> Are you objecting to the pg_basetypeof() name, or just to it accepting
> "any" argument? I think pg_basetypeof(regtype) would work ...
I'm not sure. "pg_basetypeof" seems like it invites confusion with
"pg_typeof", but I don't really have a better idea. Perhaps
"pg_baseofdomain(regtype)"? I'm not especially thrilled with that,
either.
Also, just to be clear, we intend this to drill down to the bottom
non-domain type, right? Do we need a second function that goes
down only one level? I'm inclined to say "no", mainly because
(1) that would complicate the naming situation even more, and
(2) that use-case is pretty easy to handle with a sub-select.
regards, tom lane
