I wrote:
> I reviewed and pushed these. Let's not forget that the pageinspect
> one is still pending, though. We were waiting on Tomas' fix, which
> is now pushed at 957ba9ff1, so I suppose it needs a rebase.
Actually ... that one's quite trivial, so I went ahead and pushed it.
The submitted patch had the functions as PARALLEL SAFE, but I think
they have to remain PARALLEL RESTRICTED because they use
tuple_data_split(), cf pageinspect--1.10--1.11.sql.
regards, tom lane