Re: pg_class catalog question... - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jonah H. Harris
Subject Re: pg_class catalog question...
Date
Msg-id 36e682920603310909r72df1d80k7a1df972013a6f0f@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_class catalog question...  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 3/31/06, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> This argument falls flat when you consider that the width of a CHAR
> entry is measured in characters, not bytes, and therefore its physical
> size is not fixed even if its logical width is.

Gotta love multibyte :)

--
Jonah H. Harris, Database Internals Architect
EnterpriseDB Corporation
732.331.1324


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Index vacuum improvements
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: WAL dirty-buffer management bug