> I'm sorry for not having read (and not reading) the other thread yet,
> but what was the reason we couldn't store that oid in a column in the
> pg_s_p_vacuum-view?
> Could you summarize the other solutions that were considered for this issue?
Thanks for your feedback!
The reason we cannot stick the oid in pg_s_p_vacuum is because it will
not work for parallel vacuum as only the leader process has an entry
in pg_s_p_vacuum.
With a function the leader or worker pid can be passed in to the function
and will return the indexrelid being processed.
Regards,
Sami
