Re: 2021-09 Commitfest - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: 2021-09 Commitfest
Date
Msg-id 3691402.1633188721@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: 2021-09 Commitfest  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>)
Responses Re: 2021-09 Commitfest  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Re: 2021-09 Commitfest  (Jaime Casanova <jcasanov@systemguards.com.ec>)
List pgsql-hackers
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> writes:
> On 2021-Oct-02, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Yeah.  I have been thinking of looking through the oldest CF entries
>> and proposing that we just reject any that look permanently stalled.

> I was just going to say the same thing yesterday, and reference [1]
> when I did it once in 2019.  I think it was a useful cleanup exercise.
> [1] https://postgr.es/m/20190930182818.GA25331@alvherre.pgsql

Right.  Michael and Jaime have been doing some of that too in the last
few days, but obviously a CFM should only do that unilaterally in very
clear-cut cases of patch abandonment.  I was intending to go after some
where maybe a bit of community consensus is needed for rejection.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: 2021-09 Commitfest
Next
From: Justin Pryzby
Date:
Subject: Re: should frontend tools use syncfs() ?