Re: Serializable read only deferrable- implications - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Serializable read only deferrable- implications
Date
Msg-id 368694.1646756481@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Serializable read only deferrable- implications  (Michael Lewis <mlewis@entrata.com>)
Responses Re: Serializable read only deferrable- implications
List pgsql-general
Michael Lewis <mlewis@entrata.com> writes:
>> A transaction started with the first statement will not take any SI locks,
>> nor will it ever receive a serialization error.

> What is the meaning of SI? Anything you are aware of in source code or a
> blog post that discusses this?

There's src/backend/storage/lmgr/README-SSI, which might or might
not be the level of detail you are looking for.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Michael Lewis
Date:
Subject: Re: Serializable read only deferrable- implications
Next
From: Adrian Klaver
Date:
Subject: Re: Serializable read only deferrable- implications