Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> writes:
> So based on that I think that we could just apply and backpatch what
> you have here. This issue is much easier to reason about on HEAD
> where we just care about Win >= 10, and we've be rather careful with
> changes like that when it came to Windows. Any objections about doing
> a backpatch? I'd like to do so after an extra lookup, if there are no
> objections. Or would folks prefer a HEAD-only fix for now?
Let's just fix it in HEAD. I think the risk/reward ratio isn't very
good here.
(I'd be particularly against changing this in v10, because 10.23 will
be the last one; there will be no second chance if we ship it broken.)
regards, tom lane
