Re: Insert/select union bug - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Michael Glaesemann
Subject Re: Insert/select union bug
Date
Msg-id 367229F1-E589-4386-890F-5C3F84008709@seespotcode.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Insert/select union bug  (Peter <peter@greatnowhere.com>)
List pgsql-general
On Sep 27, 2006, at 20:39 , Peter wrote:

>> Using COPY avoids this issue ofcourse, because there's a direct
>> link to the table. Similarly, as of 8.2 it will be possible to do:
>> INSERT INTO table (blah) VALUES (x,y,a),(f,d,g),(s,f,g), etc...
>> Which will also avoid the issue.
> COPY wont work... my list of columns for insert is also dynamically
> built and will never cover all fields in table.

How about doing the two-step? Create a temp table with the columns
you're going to load, COPY into the temp table, and do a INSERT INTO
table (...) SELECT ... FROM temp_table?

Michael Glaesemann
grzm seespotcode net



pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Peter
Date:
Subject: Re: Insert/select union bug
Next
From: Martijn van Oosterhout
Date:
Subject: Re: Insert/select union bug