Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints
Date
Msg-id 3664321.1659650725@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints  (Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints
List pgsql-hackers
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> Yea. I think at the very least we need to start holding interrupts before the
> DropDatabaseBuffers() and do so until commit. That's probably best done by
> doing the transaction commit inside dropdb.

We've talked before about ignoring interrupts across commit, but
I find the idea a bit scary.  In any case, DROP DATABASE is far
from the only place with a problem.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints
Next
From: Nathan Bossart
Date:
Subject: Re: optimize lookups in snapshot [sub]xip arrays