Re: Performance problem with semi-large tables - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Performance problem with semi-large tables
Date
Msg-id 3657.1107107402@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Performance problem with semi-large tables  (PFC <lists@boutiquenumerique.com>)
List pgsql-performance
PFC <lists@boutiquenumerique.com> writes:
>> For example, let's add another filter to get all the shipments with
>> release code '5' that are 7 days old or newer.
>>
>> ss.date >= current_date - 7

>     It's the order by + limit which makes the query behaves badly, and which
> forces use of kludges to use the index. If you add another condition like
> that, it should be a breeze.

Actually, that date condition has its own problem, namely that the
compared-to value isn't a constant.  The 8.0 planner is able to realize
that this is a pretty selective condition, but prior releases fall back
on a very pessimistic default estimate.  I'm sure that has something to
do with Ken not being able to get it to use an index on date.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: PFC
Date:
Subject: Re: Performance problem with semi-large tables
Next
From: "N S"
Date:
Subject: Re: Postgres server getting slow!!