Re: [HACKERS] Re: order by and index path - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas G. Lockhart
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Re: order by and index path
Date
Msg-id 36260694.9139563E@alumni.caltech.edu
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: order by and index path  (jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck))
Responses Statistics on key distribution (was: Re: order by and index path)  (jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck))
Re: [HACKERS] Re: order by and index path  (Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
>     We  do  not  have  this statistical information. So the whole
>     thing is at this time academic.

I recall that Commercial Ingres made the assumption that one row (or 1%
of rows? My memory of Ingres is fading :) would be returned from a
qualified query if no statistics were available to suggest otherwise.

It did collect statistics on data distribution to try to help make those
optimizer choices.

It may be reasonable to assume that if there is an index, then using it
with any qualified query would be a win. Since the alternative is to
decide to _not_ use an index, a decision for which we have no support
with existing statistics.

                        - Tom

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Brook Milligan
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] perl interface bug?
Next
From: "Thomas G. Lockhart"
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] postmaster locking issues.