Re: Options for protocol level cursors - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From James William Pye
Subject Re: Options for protocol level cursors
Date
Msg-id 361E10A2-8563-4907-A82B-19068BE7484D@jwp.name
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Options for protocol level cursors  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Options for protocol level cursors  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Jun 12, 2008, at 4:45 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Huh?  I don't see why... you might have such a limitation in a
> particular driver, but not in the protocol.

Oh? I know when you bind a prepared statement you have the ability
state the formats of each column, but I'm not aware of the protocol's
capacity to reconfigure the formats of an already existing cursor; ie,
a DECLARE'd cursor. I know you can use the Describe message to learn
about the cursor's column types and formats....

Got a link to the part of the protocol docs describing this feature?

>> Also, the latter has other problems wrt statement parameters. I guess
>> you
>> could prepare(protocol level) the DECLARE, but that seems like a  
>> gross
>> workaround as it defeats the purpose of prepared statements by  
>> forcing
>> you
>> to create a new statement for each cursor that you plan to open.
>
> Well, using a query for a cursor is grounds for replanning anyway,
> because you might want a fast-start plan in such a case.  And it's
> *definitely* grounds for replanning if you are asking for SCROLL
> capability --- the plan stored for a regular prepared statement
> very likely can't support that.

Ah, that is good to know. Thanks.


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: default client encoding in postgresql.conf
Next
From: "Greg Sabino Mullane"
Date:
Subject: Re: Overhauling GUCS