Re:Re: backup server core when redo btree_xlog_insert that type is XLOG_BTREE_INSERT_POST - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From yuansong
Subject Re:Re: backup server core when redo btree_xlog_insert that type is XLOG_BTREE_INSERT_POST
Date
Msg-id 35b0b8dc.21.193509eef96.Coremail.yyuansong@126.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: backup server core when redo btree_xlog_insert that type is XLOG_BTREE_INSERT_POST  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>)
List pgsql-hackers

There may be something wrong with my previous description, "Should nhtids be less than or equal to IndexTupleSize(oposting)?

Why is nhtids larger than IndexTupleSize(oposting) " Here nhtids should be nmovebytes.

It is normal whether nhtids is larger than IndexTupleSize(oposting) or smaller than IndexTupleSize(oposting).

Should nmovebytes be smaller than IndexTupleSize(oposting)?


I checked the latest code of the master branch btree(backend\access\nbtree) and did not find any related fixes. 
This is also a low-probability event and is difficult to reproduce.

At 2024-11-21 23:58:03, "Peter Geoghegan" <pg@bowt.ie> wrote: >On Thu, Nov 21, 2024 at 10:03 AM yuansong <yyuansong@126.com> wrote: >> Should nhtids be less than or equal to IndexTupleSize(oposting)? >> Why is nhtids larger than IndexTupleSize(oposting) ? I think there should be an error in the master host writing the wal log. >> Does anyone know when this will happen? > >It'll happen whenever there is a certain kind of data corruption. > >There were complaints about issues like this in the past. But those >complaints seem to have gone away when more hardening was added to the >code that runs during original execution (not the REDO routine code, >which can only do what it is told to do by the WAL record). > >You're using PostgreSQL 13.2, which is a very old point release that >lacks this hardening -- the current 13 point release is 13.18, so >you're missing a lot. Had you been on a later point release you'd very >probably have still had the issue with corruption (which could be from >bad hardware), but you likely would have avoided the problem with the >REDO routine crashing like this. > >-- >Peter Geoghegan

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Andrey M. Borodin"
Date:
Subject: Re: Forbid to DROP temp tables of other sessions
Next
From: Jelte Fennema-Nio
Date:
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Add non-blocking version of PQcancel