Re: [HACKERS] now 6.4 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas G. Lockhart
Subject Re: [HACKERS] now 6.4
Date
Msg-id 3580BDEC.4253646C@alumni.caltech.edu
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] now 6.4  (t-ishii@sra.co.jp)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] now 6.4
Re: [HACKERS] now 6.4
List pgsql-hackers
> Even if catalogs would not be changed, initdb is required
> since we have added a new function octet_length().
>
> Please correct me if I'm wrong.

And functions for implicit conversion between the old 1-byte "char" type
and the new 1-byte "char[1]" type, same for "name" to/from "text".

I have int8 (64-bit integers) ready to put into the backend. Once enough
platforms figure out how to get 64-bit integers defined, then we can
consider using them for numeric() and decimal() types also. Alphas and
ix86/Linux should already work.

I had assumed that PowerPC had 64-bit ints (along with 64-bit
addressing) but now suspect I was wrong. If anyone volunteers info on
how to get 64-bit ints on their platform I'll including that in the
first version. For gcc on ix86, "long long int" does the trick, and for
Alphas "long int" should be enough.

                   - Tom

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Upgrading (was: now 6.4)
Next
From: t-ishii@sra.co.jp
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] now 6.4