Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> On 2022-02-16 20:22:23 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> There's no disconnection log entry for either, which I suppose means
>> that somebody didn't bother logging disconnection for walsenders ...
> The thing is, we actually *do* log disconnection for walsenders:
Ah, my mistake, now I do see a disconnection entry for the other walsender
launched by the basebackup.
> Starting a node in recovery and having it connect to the primary seems like a
> mighty long time for a process to exit, unless it's stuck behind something.
Fair point. Also, 019_replslot_limit.pl hasn't been changed in any
material way in months, but *something's* changed recently, because
this just started. I scraped the buildfarm for instances of
"Failed test 'have walsender pid" going back 6 months, and what I find is
sysname | branch | snapshot | stage | l
--------------+--------+---------------------+---------------+---------------------------------------------
desmoxytes | HEAD | 2022-02-15 04:42:05 | recoveryCheck | # Failed test 'have walsender pid 1685516
idiacanthus | HEAD | 2022-02-15 07:24:05 | recoveryCheck | # Failed test 'have walsender pid 2758549
serinus | HEAD | 2022-02-15 11:00:08 | recoveryCheck | # Failed test 'have walsender pid 3682154
desmoxytes | HEAD | 2022-02-15 11:04:05 | recoveryCheck | # Failed test 'have walsender pid 3775359
flaviventris | HEAD | 2022-02-15 18:03:48 | recoveryCheck | # Failed test 'have walsender pid 1517077
idiacanthus | HEAD | 2022-02-15 22:48:05 | recoveryCheck | # Failed test 'have walsender pid 2494972
desmoxytes | HEAD | 2022-02-15 23:48:04 | recoveryCheck | # Failed test 'have walsender pid 3055399
desmoxytes | HEAD | 2022-02-16 10:48:05 | recoveryCheck | # Failed test 'have walsender pid 1593461
komodoensis | HEAD | 2022-02-16 21:16:04 | recoveryCheck | # Failed test 'have walsender pid 3726703
serinus | HEAD | 2022-02-17 01:18:17 | recoveryCheck | # Failed test 'have walsender pid 208363
So (a) it broke around 48 hours ago, which is already a useful
bit of info, and (b) your animals seem far more susceptible than
anyone else's. Why do you suppose that is?
regards, tom lane
