Re: AW: [HACKERS] mmap and MAP_ANON - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Göran Thyni
Subject Re: AW: [HACKERS] mmap and MAP_ANON
Date
Msg-id 355B0CD6.58F3CF3B@bildbasen.se
Whole thread Raw
In response to AW: [HACKERS] mmap and MAP_ANON  (Andreas Zeugswetter <andreas.zeugswetter@telecom.at>)
List pgsql-hackers
Andreas Zeugswetter wrote:
>
> >> - Could we use mmap:ing of files at a higher level then
> >>   src/backend/strorage/ipc/ipc.c to get even better performance
> >>   and cleaness?
> >
> >Yes, we could use mmap() to map the actual files.  I will post time
> >timings on this soon.
>
> I do not think this will be a practicable solution, since it would mean the whole db
> has to mmap'ed. This means there has to be enough virtual memory to hold
> the complete database, or at least one table at a time. Or do I understand this wrong ??

Why would we map the whole database or even a whole table?
You can map the section of a file you are interested in.

# man mmap

Besides a sensible memory manager does not actually map the pages
until they are access, unfort. not all OSes are sensible.


--
---------------------------------------------
Göran Thyni, sysadm, JMS Bildbasen, Kiruna

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Thomas G. Lockhart"
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] char(8) vs char8
Next
From: darcy@druid.net (D'Arcy J.M. Cain)
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] char(8) vs char8