Re: Which SET TYPE don't actually require a rewrite - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Which SET TYPE don't actually require a rewrite
Date
Msg-id 3553965.1594999616@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Which SET TYPE don't actually require a rewrite  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
Responses Re: Which SET TYPE don't actually require a rewrite  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes:
> As Amit mentions it is also triggered by some store parameter changes. But
> not all. So looking at it the other way, the part that the end user really
> cares about it "which ALTER TABLE operations will rewrite the table and
> which will not". Maybe what we need is a section specifically on this that
> summarizes all the different ways that it can happen.

No, what we need is EXPLAIN for DDL ;-).  Trying to keep such
documentation in sync with the actual code behavior would be impossible.
(For one thing, some aspects can be affected by extension datatype
behaviors.)

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: renaming configure.in to configure.ac
Next
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: Re: Add header support to text format and matching feature