Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PORTS] BSDI-3.1 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas G. Lockhart
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PORTS] BSDI-3.1
Date
Msg-id 353F6124.BD079930@alumni.caltech.edu
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PORTS] BSDI-3.1  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
> > Hackers, is the gram.c file not new enough in the 6.3.2 tarball?
>
> Apparently not: I note that my recompile rebuilt it too.  (Fortunately
> I have bison installed.)  tar says
>
> $ tar tvfz ~postgres/archive/postgresql-6.3.2.tar.gz | grep /gram
> -rw-r--r-- pgsql/wheel  398333 1998-04-17 03:00 postgresql-6.3.2/src/backend/parser/gram.c
> -rw-r--r-- pgsql/wheel  126012 1998-04-17 03:00 postgresql-6.3.2/src/backend/parser/gram.y

Bruce, what I usually try to do (but sometimes forget) is to commit the
two files separately, doing a "touch" on gram.c after committing gram.y
and before committing gram.c. That way, there is a significant time
difference between the two files.

                         - Tom

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Byron Nikolaidis
Date:
Subject: retrieving varchar size
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: HP-UX porting strategy (moved from PATCHES)