Re: [HACKERS] Keyword - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas G. Lockhart
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Keyword
Date
Msg-id 35094AF5.993BDD80@alumni.caltech.edu
Whole thread Raw
In response to Keyword  (Michael Meskes <meskes@topsystem.de>)
List pgsql-hackers
> I'm currently trying to get ecpg more in line with the backends
> parser. Doing so I found ecpg accepts a syntax the backend doesn't.
> It's 'commit work release' which is accepted for compatibility with
> Oracle. How about allowing this in the backend, too?

I don't want to sound too fussy here, but does this statement provide
any functionality missing from the SQL92 syntax 'commit [work]'? If not,
then perhaps Oracle users could start writing portable code if they
cared to?

                       - Tom

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [QUESTIONS] Does Storage Manager support >2GB tables?
Next
From: "Thomas G. Lockhart"
Date:
Subject: Re: [QUESTIONS] using composite types