Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: minimal wal_level on subscriber - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Arnaud L.
Subject Re: minimal wal_level on subscriber
Date
Msg-id 34ff1759-f26f-8a90-5b2c-3c76be582f60@codata.eu
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: minimal wal_level on subscriber  (Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>)
Responses Re: minimal wal_level on subscriber
List pgsql-general
Tree view 
Le 16/01/2020 à 19:58, Laurenz Albe a écrit :
> On Thu, 2020-01-16 at 12:09 +0100, Arnaud L. wrote:
>> is it OK to set wal_level to minimal on the subscriber side of the 
>> logical replication ?
> 
> Yes, if you don't want physical backups.

You mean online physical backups ?
I could still shutdown the subscriber and take an offline physical 
backup, right ?

Regards
--
Arnaud

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Laurenz Albe
Date:
Subject: Re: minimal wal_level on subscriber
Next
From: Kyotaro Horiguchi
Date:
Subject: Re: Wall shiping replica failed to recover database with error:invalid contrecord length 1956 at FED/38FFE208