Re: minimal wal_level on subscriber - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Laurenz Albe
Subject Re: minimal wal_level on subscriber
Date
Msg-id fa3c4bfdaa9b812195667ec8424cce707fdb76c5.camel@cybertec.at
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: minimal wal_level on subscriber  ("Arnaud L." <arnaud.listes@codata.eu>)
Responses Re: minimal wal_level on subscriber
List pgsql-general
On Fri, 2020-01-17 at 08:43 +0100, Arnaud L. wrote:
> > > is it OK to set wal_level to minimal on the subscriber side of the 
> > > logical replication ?
> > 
> > Yes, if you don't want physical backups.
> 
> You mean online physical backups ?
> I could still shutdown the subscriber and take an offline physical 
> backup, right ?

Yes, that is what I mean.

Yours,
Laurenz Albe
-- 
Cybertec | https://www.cybertec-postgresql.com




pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Durgamahesh Manne
Date:
Subject: Re: Regarding automatic table partitioning in PostgreSQL 12 versionis possible or not
Next
From: Dmitry Igrishin
Date:
Subject: RPC via WebSockets.